February 28, 2006

28. Edward Teller

 

 

                     
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   

Edward Teller, (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 06:01 PM

Rewrite: In the San Francisco Galleries 1-8 (after Donald Judd)

 

 

In early February I began quoting short reviews that Donald Judd wrote for Arts Magazine in the late 50's and early 60's that were eventually compiled (February 13, 2006) with some explanation of context and my attraction to the writing. Certainly, Judd's writing could be terse and his judgments harsh, but what I found attractive was his dense use of form and language and his willingness to say what he thinks. I thought it was a useful example; the New Yorker magazine does something similar each issue: paragraph-sized reviews say a fair amount in few words, the difference being from Judd's that the judgments aren't typically as severe, and instead are a little less decisive and more open-ended. Many of the essays I have written in the past year have been well over one thousand words, many approaching two thousand or more. I wondered if I could effectively write in a shorter form, and write about more exhibits.

On February 18 I made the rounds of the downtown San Francisco galleries. Quite often, this is an experience that leaves me feeling dissatisfied because it seems to me much of the art misses its mark. At the same time, I think I usually have a pretty decent ability to look into work and see what mark it is supposed to hit, to see what someone is honestly trying to get at. I assume that, for the most part, just about every artist has some honest intention, even if the artist can't articulate it, or the intention is barely apparent, and even if the art doesn't work- otherwise, why bother? So I thought, "Why not write about that?"

With Judd in mind I walked the SF galleries, and as I looked I began to wonder what would happen if I removed any filters I have, or as much as I could, and simply said what comes to mind about the art, and also about the places where it's shown, the milieu. Isn't that as much a part of the art? Contemporary art is a minefield of judgments and nuance, earnestness and sleight of hand, attempts to fly and splat landings. Is the artist sincere or ironic? Does skill matter or doesn't it? Does a body of work in a show have to look like a product line or not? What is the place of craft and care these days? What is the appeal of photography? Does drawing matter? Are certain forms of art dead and gone? What are my biases considering my generation, my education, my background, my art, my day job, the number of hours I have in a week? What exactly is the thickness and vulnerability of the membrane between what I think art's purpose is and it's place in the commercial world? What are the contradictions regarding art's purpose in a commercial setting? What comes first, form or theory? Why are there so many artists? Why is there so much photography and drawing that looks to me like illustration? What is the effect of an attractive gallery's interior over one less attractive? How does the friendliness of staff or the gallerist affect judgment? If I'm hoping to show at a gallery will I pull my punches? Don't I really just want to be friends?

I wondered: what if I consciously remove the filter that can make for manners, and kindness, and wanting to say something nice, and just let myself write, let myself say whatever came to mind? What if I shot from the hip, went with my gut, wrote from impulsive first impressions and memory? What could I have to say after seeing over twenty shows within three and a half hours or so? What if I wrote about what I saw with no chance to go back and look again, or perhaps even to look that closely to begin with? What if I deliberately avoided being easily positive, or a cheerleader, or failed to see the effort in someone's work? What if I just didn't care if people judged me for the way I thought of the art I saw?

It is curious to me that, for the most part, this review format led me to some quite negative writing, sometimes hard and dismissive, other times flip and dishy. I'm not entirely sure what to make of this. Certainly, it has something to do with the art I viewed, but I think it goes deeper than that. I think it has to do with a general unhappiness with what I see in commercial galleries. Perhaps it has to do with an unhappiness with the whole enterprise. Perhaps it has to do with an unhappiness with myself (even though I swore off writing about myself personally in a weblog many years or so ago). Maybe I just felt like reveling in a little dirt.

Or maybe, it's all just a little arbitrary. Maybe it's simply too easy to go one way or another. Does it really matter? What if, if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all? What if I rewrote my reviews and gave them a little nicer spin? There's a good way to blow one's credibility, if it isn't already gone after all this curmudgeonliness.

Below are the reviews, before and after. On the left is the original review I wrote, and on the write is a cleaned-up, nicer review.

Before After
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Brian Rutenberg: Abstraction as landscape the old-fashioned way, with brush and gesture; Rutenberg seems to have no interest in hiding that connection. In some paintings with darker environments the brighter strokes— the subjects—don't integrate well, and a clearer, stronger relationship of painted stroke to the canvas' edge would give these paintings a stronger identity and greater integrity. (Toomey Tourell, Feb. 1 - 28)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Brian Rutenberg: Abstraction as landscape the old-fashioned way, with brush and gesture; Rutenberg lets that reference come through loud and clear. In many paintings a darker background makes the brighter strokes— the subjects—more pronounced and foregrounded. Rutenberg is working on defining a clearer, stronger relationship of the painted stroke to the canvas' edge, which will give these paintings a stronger identity and greater integrity. (Toomey Tourell, Feb. 1 - 28)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Kansuke Yamamoto: Vintage Photographs 1935-1955 & Nobuyoshi Araki, Masahisa Fukase, Eikoh Hosoe, Daido Moriyama, Issei Suda, Shomei Tomatsu: Japanese Photography 1960-1970: The title says it all: lots of B&W photographs by Japanese photographers. You can see them all on-line here and there. (Stephen Wirtz, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Kansuke Yamamoto: Vintage Photographs 1935-1955 & Nobuyoshi Araki, Masahisa Fukase, Eikoh Hosoe, Daido Moriyama, Issei Suda, Shomei Tomatsu: Japanese Photography 1960-1970: Two exhibits, side by side, of important Japanese photographers. Many of the pictures--black and white, gritty, urban--have the feel of alienation from post-War development that borders on surrealism. (Stephen Wirtz, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Tom Bills: Simple linear patterns cut into thick steel plate mounted on the wall; think Agnes Martin image on Richard Serra material at Richard Tuttle scale. I like them; they're direct, physical, present, and pleasing, and just a little bit puzzling: how were they cut; how long did each take to make; how much do they weigh; and how do they hang on the wall? (Don Soker, Feb. 1 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Tom Bills: Simple linear patterns cut into thick steel plate mounted on the wall; think Agnes Martin image on Richard Serra material at Richard Tuttle scale. I like them; they're direct, physical, present, and pleasing, and just a little bit puzzling: how were they cut; how long did each take to make; how much do they weigh; and how do they hang on the wall? (Don Soker, Feb. 1 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Gallery Artists: Paintings, mostly landscapes and expressionistic abstraction ("expressionistic" as in a kind of modern art cliché). However, Gary Komarin's open color fields hosting quirky, chunky, figure-like, almost cartoonish shapes are engaging, and innocently trump Ricardo Mazal's more serious, muscular, broad, planar swipes of oil. (Elins Eagles-Smith, Feb. ? - Mar. ?)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Gallery Artists: Paintings, mostly landscapes and expressionistic abstraction. Gary Komarin's engaging, open color fields host quirky, chunky, figure-like, almost cartoonish shapes which are innocently earnest. Ricardo Mazal's shows more serious, muscular, broad, planar swipes of oil. (Elins Eagles-Smith, Feb. ? - Mar. ?)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Markus Linnenbrink: In his third show at Sweetow Linnenbrink's work is still bright and shiny and full of processes like pouring beads of brilliant color down the face of a canvas to make a uniform field of thin stripes that drip off the bottom of the stretcher like stalactites or icicles, or making paintings on thick plywood with perfect hollow hemispheres that pockmark the surface showing the multiple layers of color built up in several successive pours. This work is labor intensive, and one can easily imagine a busy factory producing these things. When first shown they were beautiful and curious, and at the second showing the beauty was joined by stamina and commitment. But with this third show, further informed by a show of the same kind of work at Thatcher Projects in NYC in May 2005, it's time to take the bold Capitalist step to sell Linnenbrink Painting Kits® to hobbyists—perfect weekend projects to make something beautiful for the wall; QVC awaits. (Patrica Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Markus Linnenbrink: In his third show at Sweetow Linnenbrink's work continues the use of glossy, brilliant color and processes like pouring beads of paint down the face of a canvas to make a uniform field of thin stripes that drip off the bottom of the stretcher like stalactites or icicles, or making paintings on thick plywood with perfect hollow hemispheres that pockmark the surface showing the multiple layers of color built up in several successive pours. This work is labor intensive, and carefully controlled, but also lush and Pop-like. When first shown they were beautiful and curious; their second showing evidenced stamina and commitment. This third show, further informed by a exhibit of the same kind of work at Thatcher Projects in NYC in May 2005, continues Linnenbrink's project of giving painting a productive new life. (Patrica Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Jonathan Burstein: Three huge collages of figures (self-portraits?) made from cut magazine pages; a stack of art magazines stands nearby, but the pages are used mostly for color and texture, not for content. Each figure hold scissors, a too-obvious self-reference to the work's making. The long, thin anatomy and collaged edges made me think of Egon Schiele's line, and also his narcissism. A clever graphic eye, excellent craft, terrific sense of scale, and witty panache are the works' strong suit; unfortunately, it isn't Art. (Patricia Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Jonathan Burstein: Three huge collages of figures (self-portraits?) made from cut magazine pages; a stack of art magazines stands nearby, but the pages are used mostly for color and texture, not for content. Each figure hold scissors, a reference to the work's making. The long, thin anatomy and collaged edges made me think of Egon Schiele's line. Burnstein has a clever graphic eye, and his excellent craft and witty panache are the works' strong suit. (Patricia Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Book: A huge show of artist's books demonstrates the incredible variety of approaches to this medium and includes several standouts. Susan Marie Dopp's fifty two small Every Day Books, one made each week over a year, each of seven drawings, one made each day, contain jewel-like minimalist and patterned abstractions; collected together, they demonstrate the value of steady, daily work. Crystal Liu's "here Is Something in the Water is a beautifully-bound handmade book of drawings with connections to Chinese landscapes wrought with a fine touch, restrained color, and unique imagery. Plus, a whole case of Ed Rusha books that are now worth a hundred times the original purchase price; nice to see these in one place. Bonus: a Russel Crotty globe drawing hanging in the backroom. A nod of thanks to the very friendly attendant that day who gladly wielded the white gloves to turn pages. (Hosfeltl, Jan. 28 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Book: A huge show of artist's books demonstrates the incredible variety of approaches to this medium and includes several standouts. Susan Marie Dopp's fifty two small Every Day Books, one made each week over a year, each of seven drawings, one made each day, contain jewel-like minimalist and patterned abstractions; collected together, they demonstrate the value of steady, daily work. Crystal Liu's "here Is Something in the Water is a beautifully-bound handmade book of drawings with connections to Chinese landscapes wrought with a fine touch, restrained color, and unique imagery. Plus, a whole case of Ed Rusha books that are now worth a hundred times the original purchase price; nice to see these in one place. Bonus: a Russel Crotty globe drawing hanging in the backroom. (Hosfeltl, Jan. 28 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Aaron Petersen: Paintings that look way too much like Darren Waterston's but without the ultra-finesse; that's a good thing, but not good enough. Most of us have been there, just not in public. (Braunstein/Quay, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Aaron Petersen: Paintings with layers and drips and swooshes that invent new worlds, or new ways at looking at our current world. Bravura paint handling and a sense of mystery make Petersen a newcomer to watch. (Braunstein/Quay, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Katy Grannan: Large color photographs of apparently lonely or alienated subjects found through the artist's well-known newspaper ad recruitment process posed in various states of undress in dingy rooms with cheap wood paneling or outdoors, several near or in water. The work deals with the implications of power and voyerurism regarding the artist and the viewer, and the implications of collaboration, exhibitionism, and self--empowerment regarding the subject in ways just barely beyond banal. Thanks goodness for wonderful new printing technology, but ultimately would've made a great LIFE magazine spread in 1969. (Fraenkel, Jan. 5 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Katy Grannan: Large color photographs of apparently lonely or alienated subjects found through the artist's well-known newspaper ad recruitment process posed in various states of undress in dingy rooms with cheap wood paneling or outdoors, several near or in water. The work deals with the implications of power and voyeurism regarding the artist and the viewer, and the implications of collaboration, exhibitionism, and self-empowerment regarding the subject. (Fraenkel, Jan. 5 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Rob Craigie: This show is called Wonder; it predominately comprises paintings of butterflies on paper made in a manner well-known to pre-school children everywhere: fold a piece of paper down the middle, open it and paint a half of a butterfly on one side, then fold again and press the two sides together, and unfold for a finished butterfly. Ah, beautiful butterflies, and what variety! I did not watch the 58-minute video in the back room; would you? (Haines Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Rob Craigie: This show is called Wonder; it predominately comprises paintings of butterflies on paper made in a manner well-known to pre-school children everywhere: fold a piece of paper down the middle, open it and paint a half of a butterfly on one side, then fold again and press the two sides together, and unfold for a finished butterfly. The gallery walls are covered with scores of beautiful butterflies, which seem to be evidence of Craigie's investigation into the marks and variety found in of various insects of the order Lepidoptera,. The 58-minute video demands viewer endurance. (Haines Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Josh Dov: Very competent, sensitive, dense, beautiful grids built up with dry horizontal and vertical brushstrokes and muted colors on unprimed canvas, though a solution other than simply running strokes to and off the edge would make them look less like stretched Tartan fabric. No one in Northern California knows who Helmut Federle is except for the few who do and who probably think they are alone, so these paintings' derivation are quite safe until one looks at a Helmut Federle. Gotcha. The few works on paper are like a cleaned-up late-seventies Brice Marden, so unfortunately the cats out of the bag there. Bummer, and double bummer on the very unfriendly gallerist (minus one point); still nice work. (Brian Gross, Feb. 2 March 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Josh Dov: Very competent, sensitive, dense, beautiful grids built up with dry horizontal and vertical brushstrokes and muted colors on unprimed canvas, though a solution other than simply running strokes to and off the edge would make them look less like stretched Tartan fabric. One might think of recent Helmut Federle acrylic on raw canvas paintings, and the works on paper might remind one of Brice Marden. Dov is on his way towards finding his own voice. (Brian Gross, Feb. 2 March 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Variegated Radiant Dream Plot: Chris Duncan and Jovi Schnell are from the Bay Area (one penalty point), and David Dupuis is from New York (one bonus points). Besides, Dupuis' drawings have surprising graphic variety and complexity. Duncan's string installation is insipid; maybe that is his intention, otherwise it would make a great Deadhead Maypole. Some of Jovi Schnell's colorful drawings combine a German folk esthetic with the structure of an elaborate Mexican ceramic or Mayan Flint scepter and a Huichol palette. Possible penalty point: sometimes this gallerist appears a touch grouchy. (Gregory Lind- Jan 25 Feb 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Variegated Radiant Dream Plot: Chris Duncan and Jovi Schnell are from the Bay Area and David Dupuis is from New York. Dupuis' drawings have surprising graphic variety and complexity. Duncan's string installation is uninspired; it would make a great Deadhead Maypole. Some of Jovi Schnell's colorful drawings combine a German folk esthetic with the structure of an elaborate Mexican ceramic or Mayan Flint scepter and a Huichol palette. (Gregory Lind- Jan 25 Feb 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Glen Baxter: Large, captioned cartoon-like drawings on paper in ink and colored pencil of plain-spoken cowboys with names like Tex having Modern Art moments. Witty, yet with a short shelf-life. Generally well-drawn; the roughly colored areas are reminders that these are drawings, not printed cartoons. Fun, sure, but they miss a calling in life as wonderful greeting cards. (Modernism, Jan. 19 - Mar. 4)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Glen Baxter: Large, captioned cartoon-like drawings on paper in ink and colored pencil of plain-spoken cowboys with names like Tex having Modern Art moments. Witty, yet with a short shelf-life. Generally well-drawn; the roughly colored areas are reminders that these are drawings, not printed cartoons. (Modernism, Jan. 19 - Mar. 4)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Abstract Paintings: Dense, fresh, juicy, relatively recent monochromes of thickly brushed oil by James Hayward; they're good. David Simpson paintings from the Eighties when he still bothered to compose a picture; they're pretty good. Charles Arnoldi paintings: they are paintings. All artists lose points for showing with the most arrogant and/or rudest gallerist in San Franciso. (Modernism, Jan. 19 - Mar. 4)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Abstract Paintings: Dense, fresh, juicy, relatively recent monochromes of thickly brushed oil by James Hayward; they're good. David Simpson paintings from the Eighties positioning squares and rectangles around the canvas' edges, before he went monochrome. Charles Arnoldi's paintings consist of several panels, each with ovals made with layers of scraped, striated color. (Modernism, Jan. 19 - Mar. 4)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
John Roloff: Three large plaster sculptures of very elaborate, curly-haired, powdered wigs; what 17th century French or English portrait are these from? I know these are quoted from somewhere: Louis XIV? Also, large prints of photos from the National Archives of Civil War-era ships. Neither the artist nor the gallery is much help in understanding any of this. Who knows what it all means? Not me. (Paule Anglim, Feb. 1-25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
John Roloff: Three large plaster sculptures of very elaborate, curly-haired, powdered wigs remind this viewer of Louis XIV. Also, large prints of photos from the National Archives of Civil War-era ships. Roloff is working with images from two distinct eras, but the references are a tad obscure. (Paule Anglim, Feb. 1-25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Ala Ebtekar: delicate pencil drawings on paper of figures, mostly outlined with few details; they seem to be tracings made with a lightbox, projected images, or templates. The lines show erasure and areas of emphasis to make them appear more hand-drawn. The press release tells us the "artist adapts images from Iranian gymnasium poses revisiting the images with a contemporary viewpoint and inviting comparisons with today's hip hop culture and its idiomatic gestures and poses." I'm obviously of the wrong demographic. (Paule Anglim, Feb. 1-25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Ala Ebtekar: delicate pencil drawings on paper of figures, mostly outlined with few details; they seem to be tracings made with a lightbox, projected images, or templates. The lines show erasure and areas of emphasis to make them appear more hand-drawn. The press release tells us the "artist adapts images from Iranian gymnasium poses revisiting the images with a contemporary viewpoint and inviting comparisons with today's hip hop culture and its idiomatic gestures and poses." This mash-up of images from two cultures is evidence of the borders art crosses. (Paule Anglim, Feb. 1-25)

Visited February 18, 2006

Exhibits seen that I did not write about:

Heather Marx- Michael Arcega: Getting Mid-Evil, February 2, 2006 – March 11

Rena Bransten- Matthias Hoch, Ari Marcopolous, January 19 - February 25

Takada- Laura Paulini, February 18-March 28

Newmark- Contemporary European Abstraction, January 31 - March 25

John Berggruen- Selected Works, January 7 - February 25

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 12:42 AM

February 27, 2006

27. Washington Gubernatorial Election, 2004

 

 

                     
                     
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
               

Washington Gubernatorial Election, 2004, (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 11:20 PM

February 26, 2006

26. History of Portugal (1777-1834)

 

 

                     
   
 
       
 
           
   
 
 
 
               
 
   
   
   
   
   

History of Portugal (1777-1834) (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 09:16 PM

8. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Brian Rutenberg: Abstraction as landscape the old-fashioned way, with brush and gesture; Rutenberg seems to have no interest in hiding that connection. In some paintings with darker environments the brighter strokes— the subjects—don't integrate well, and a clearer, stronger relationship of painted stroke to the canvas' edge would give these paintings a stronger identity and greater integrity. (Toomey Tourell, Feb. 1 - 28)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Brian Rutenberg: Abstraction as landscape the old-fashioned way, with brush and gesture; Rutenberg lets that reference come through loud and clear. In many paintings a darker background makes the brighter strokes— the subjects—more pronounced and foregrounded. Rutenberg is working on defining a clearer, stronger relationship of the painted stroke to the canvas' edge, which will give these paintings a stronger identity and greater integrity. (Toomey Tourell, Feb. 1 - 28)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Kansuke Yamamoto: Vintage Photographs 1935-1955 & Nobuyoshi Araki, Masahisa Fukase, Eikoh Hosoe, Daido Moriyama, Issei Suda, Shomei Tomatsu: Japanese Photography 1960-1970: The title says it all: lots of B&W photographs by Japanese photographers. You can see them all on-line here and there. (Stephen Wirtz, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Kansuke Yamamoto: Vintage Photographs 1935-1955 & Nobuyoshi Araki, Masahisa Fukase, Eikoh Hosoe, Daido Moriyama, Issei Suda, Shomei Tomatsu: Japanese Photography 1960-1970: Two exhibits, side by side, of important Japanese photographers. Many of the pictures--black and white, gritty, urban--have the feel of alienation from post-War development that borders on surrealism. (Stephen Wirtz, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 09:14 PM

Theatre as Pictorial Space

 

 

The Rothko Room, Fondation Beyeler, Basel Robert Zandvliet: Untitled, 1997, egg tempera on linen, 241,5 x 376 cm, De Pont Museum of Contemporary Art, Tilburg
René Daniëls: A Hot Day in the Lighthouse, 1984, oil on canvas, 130 x 170 cm, De Pont Museum of Contemporary Art, Tilburg Hiroshi Sugimoto: U.A. Playhouse, New York, 1978, photograph, Private Collection

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 06:39 PM

February 25, 2006

25. Médecins Sans Frontières

 

 

                     
         
     
     
         
     
     
     
     
     
         
     
     
     
     
         
     

Médecins Sans Frontières (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 11:59 PM

7. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Markus Linnenbrink: In his third show at Sweetow Linnenbrink's work is still bright and shiny and full of processes like pouring beads of brilliant color down the face of a canvas to make a uniform field of thin stripes that drip off the bottom of the stretcher like stalactites or icicles, or making paintings on thick plywood with perfect hollow hemispheres that pockmark the surface showing the multiple layers of color built up in several successive pours. This work is labor intensive, and one can easily imagine a busy factory producing these things. When first shown they were beautiful and curious, and at the second showing the beauty was joined by stamina and commitment. But with this third show, further informed by a show of the same kind of work at Thatcher Projects in NYC in May 2005, it's time to take the bold Capitalist step to sell Linnenbrink Painting Kits® to hobbyists—perfect weekend projects to make something beautiful for the wall; QVC awaits. (Patrica Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Markus Linnenbrink: In his third show at Sweetow Linnenbrink's work continues the use of glossy, brilliant color and processes like pouring beads of paint down the face of a canvas to make a uniform field of thin stripes that drip off the bottom of the stretcher like stalactites or icicles, or making paintings on thick plywood with perfect hollow hemispheres that pockmark the surface showing the multiple layers of color built up in several successive pours. This work is labor intensive, and carefully controlled, but also lush and Pop-like. When first shown they were beautiful and curious; their second showing evidenced stamina and commitment. This third show, further informed by a exhibit of the same kind of work at Thatcher Projects in NYC in May 2005, continues Linnenbrink's project of giving painting a productive new life. (Patrica Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Jonathan Burstein: Three huge collages of figures (self-portraits?) made from cut magazine pages; a stack of art magazines stands nearby, but the pages are used mostly for color and texture, not for content. Each figure hold scissors, a too-obvious self-reference to the work's making. The long, thin anatomy and collaged edges made me think of Egon Schiele's line, and also his narcissism. A clever graphic eye, excellent craft, terrific sense of scale, and witty panache are the works' strong suit; unfortunately, it isn't Art. (Patricia Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Jonathan Burstein: Three huge collages of figures (self-portraits?) made from cut magazine pages; a stack of art magazines stands nearby, but the pages are used mostly for color and texture, not for content. Each figure hold scissors, a reference to the work's making. The long, thin anatomy and collaged edges made me think of Egon Schiele's line. Burnstein has a clever graphic eye, and his excellent craft and witty panache are the works' strong suit. (Patricia Sweetow, Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 11:59 PM

February 24, 2006

24. Flag of Mexico

 

 

                                                   
                                                   
           
       
   
   
   
       
           
               
         
     
 
 
     
         
               

Flag of Mexico (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 11:59 PM

6. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Tom Bills: Simple linear patterns cut into thick steel plate mounted on the wall; think Agnes Martin image on Richard Serra material at Richard Tuttle scale. I like them; they're direct, physical, present, and pleasing, and just a little bit puzzling: how were they cut; how long did each take to make; how much do they weigh; and how do they hang on the wall? (Don Soker, Feb. 1 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Tom Bills: Simple linear patterns cut into thick steel plate mounted on the wall; think Agnes Martin image on Richard Serra material at Richard Tuttle scale. I like them; they're direct, physical, present, and pleasing, and just a little bit puzzling: how were they cut; how long did each take to make; how much do they weigh; and how do they hang on the wall? (Don Soker, Feb. 1 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Gallery Artists: Paintings, mostly landscapes and expressionistic abstraction ("expressionistic" as in a kind of modern art cliché). However, Gary Komarin's open color fields hosting quirky, chunky, figure-like, almost cartoonish shapes are engaging, and innocently trump Ricardo Mazal's more serious, muscular, broad, planar swipes of oil. (Elins Eagles-Smith, Feb. ? - Mar. ?)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Gallery Artists: Paintings, mostly landscapes and expressionistic abstraction. Gary Komarin's engaging, open color fields host quirky, chunky, figure-like, almost cartoonish shapes which are innocently earnest. Ricardo Mazal's shows more serious, muscular, broad, planar swipes of oil. (Elins Eagles-Smith, Feb. ? - Mar. ?)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 11:59 PM

February 23, 2006

23. Panama Canal

 

 

                     
       
       
       
     
         
   
   
   
       
         
   
 
 
   
       
   

Panama Canal (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 12:02 AM

5. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Book: A huge show of artist's books demonstrates the incredible variety of approaches to this medium and includes several standouts. Susan Marie Dopp's fifty two small Every Day Books, one made each week over a year, each of seven drawings, one made each day, contain jewel-like minimalist and patterned abstractions; collected together, they demonstrate the value of steady, daily work. Crystal Liu's "here Is Something in the Water is a beautifully-bound handmade book of drawings with connections to Chinese landscapes wrought with a fine touch, restrained color, and unique imagery. Plus, a whole case of Ed Rusha books that are now worth a hundred times the original purchase price; nice to see these in one place. Bonus: a Russel Crotty globe drawing hanging in the backroom. A nod of thanks to the very friendly attendant that day who gladly wielded the white gloves to turn pages. (Hosfeltl, Jan. 28 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Book: A huge show of artist's books demonstrates the incredible variety of approaches to this medium and includes several standouts. Susan Marie Dopp's fifty two small Every Day Books, one made each week over a year, each of seven drawings, one made each day, contain jewel-like minimalist and patterned abstractions; collected together, they demonstrate the value of steady, daily work. Crystal Liu's "here Is Something in the Water is a beautifully-bound handmade book of drawings with connections to Chinese landscapes wrought with a fine touch, restrained color, and unique imagery. Plus, a whole case of Ed Rusha books that are now worth a hundred times the original purchase price; nice to see these in one place. Bonus: a Russel Crotty globe drawing hanging in the backroom. (Hosfeltl, Jan. 28 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Aaron Petersen: Paintings that look way too much like Darren Waterston's but without the ultra-finesse; that's a good thing, but not good enough. Most of us have been there, just not in public. (Braunstein/Quay, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Aaron Petersen: Paintings with layers and drips and swooshes that invent new worlds, or new ways at looking at our current world. Bravura paint handling and a sense of mystery make Petersen a newcomer to watch. (Braunstein/Quay, Feb. 15 - Mar. 18)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 12:01 AM

February 22, 2006

22. History of Merit Badges (Boy Scouts of America)

 

 

     
                     
     
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

History of Merit Badges (Boy Scouts of America) (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 10:11 PM

Joe McKay in NYFA Current

 

 

Written for NYFA Current, February 2006:

Introducing... Joe McKay

Chris Ashley


Joe McKay (2006)
(Photo: Chris Ashley)

Joe McKay’s extremely diverse body of work includes live color mixing sessions to approximate a fading sun; screenings of accidental videos made with digital cameras; and the website Prereview, where he reviews movies that haven’t yet come out. As versatile conceptually as he is materially, what drives McKay’s work is social interaction—his pieces usually require viewer interactivity to make them fully come to life. Here, Oakland-based artist and weblogger Chris Ashley introduces the media art of Joe McKay.

Over the course of five evenings last fall, in a field behind Joe McKay’s studio at the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay, small groups gathered to watch him paint the sunset. During the first night only a few people were present, but word got out and the crowds grew for successive presentations of Sunset Solitaire. Facing west, McKay manipulated a small controller box with three sliding switches, one each for red, green, and blue. Connected to a laptop and running the Director program, the box enabled him to mix horizontal bands of color. The resulting image was projected onto a free-standing building in the field, all under a darkening sky.

The audience watched as McKay attempted to match his digitally painted sunset, mixed live, to the real sunset as it slowly and quietly transitioned from blue to orange to fiery pink before finally fading to indigo. Appearing side-by-side, the actual and projected sunsets sometimes merged and sometimes remained jarringly distinct. An exhilarating meeting of pastoral and technological was found in the wonder and pleasure of watching a gorgeous sunset in the company of others, and the fugitive illusionism achieved when McKay’s simulated sky momentarily matched the real one to produce a seamless vista was awe-inspiring. Even documented as a 30-minute DVD, the work contains startling moments when the blend of elements from the natural and digital worlds is hypnotic and truly sublime.


Joe McKay
View of Sunset Solitaire (2005)

Sunset Solitaire references computer games, of course, in this case one played by an individual and watched by others, but there are a range of other associations. The Hudson River School painters and Mark Rothko’s glowing rectangles readily come to mind, as do the evocatively nostalgic memories of drive-in movies (for those of a certain age) or less anxious manifestations of ’60s light shows (for those of another certain age). While presenting Sunset Solitaire McKay becomes a deejay who mixes color rather than sound. There is a sleight of hand at work when he matches the fading sun’s color exactly; an effect that’s pure trompe l’oeil. One might think of Vasari’s anecdote about Giotto painting a fly on one of Cimabue’s paintings, which the older master tried to shoo away, or of Alexander the Great's horse neighing in recognition at the portrait painted by Apelles.

McKay calls Sunset Solitaire an "intervention" rather than a performance. Perhaps this is because he responds to different environmental conditions that can’t be reliably replicated each time he presents the piece. Or perhaps it is because it is the viewer who usually performs interactively with his installations. No matter the label, Sunset Solitaire exhibits a complex layering of characteristics common in much of McKay’s recent art.

McKay grew up near the City of London, Ontario, and lived and worked in New York for ten years before moving to San Francisco in 2004. His exhibition record includes many solo works as well as collaborations with San Francisco artist Kristin Lucas and Toronto artist Sally McKay, his sister. In his recent work McKay uses computers other equipment as sculptural components and recontextualizes video and game imagery in unexpected ways. A piece of technology might be exploited for purposes other than that for which it was originally designed or because it was badly designed to begin with. In some works, elements of relatively “new” technology—a computer tower, a monitor, or the carriage from a printer—look old and obsolete, rejected and falling apart.

In some of McKay’s recent Kinetic Computer Sculptures, images appear and actions occur peripherally, like in a new untitled work in his studio where a projected figure on a wall is briefly glimpsed from the corner of one’s eye but promptly disappears when one looks back at it. Another kinetic sculpture with the working title Search and Rescue is best described by McKay: “…a computer-driven motor with LED attached is illuminating the insides of an opened Mac tower. A monitor lying on its side displays an image of the computer and light from above, capturing the erratic motion of the motor, as if there was an overhead camera. On the monitor, however, the motor and light rotate faster than the “real” motor inside the computer. This discontinuity is a clue to the fact that there is no camera, and adds to the tension in the piece.” Splayed out on the floor as if unceremoniously—even violently—dumped and forgotten, it’s easy to experience a surprisingly emotional reaction to the traumatized equipment, which is deepened by the subsequent sense of invasive and poorly synchronized surveillance and the viewer’s inability to completely explain what is happening.

Operating at the edges of what we think this consumer technology should and should not do, McKay’s art leads us into the gap between expectation and evidence, challenging the viewer to consider what one sees and how the technology works. But unlike the Wizard of Oz behind his curtain, McKay has thrown the curtain away and places the apparatus of his works before us without concealing his tricks.


Joe McKay
Big Ups (2005)
Site-specific installation at
Long Island University, Brooklyn Campus

The audience’s shared experience of Sunset Solitaire is more passive in comparison to the active audience involvement that is key to much of McKay’s other work. Audio Pong, which McKay calls an “audience participation performance duet,” is a remake of Pong, one of the earliest video games, although McKay’s version is controlled by microphones instead of joysticks; the louder the player talks, the higher their paddle goes. The Color Game engages two players using slider switches who try to match colors projected in increasingly complex patters. Big Ups is a site-specific installation encouraging players to jump on an electronic doormat to propel the image of a ball as high as possible on a TV monitor; one’s reward is a larger and heavier ball. In these works, just as in Sunset Solitaire, interaction and a shared social experience are McKay’s goals. The viewer is engaged not just to see the work, but to also make it happen. Technology is often blamed for the alienation of people from their work and from each other, but McKay employs it as a poetic means to initiate human interaction—with one’s senses and with one another.

Chris Ashley is an artist and educator who also writes about art. He has recently exhibited at Gallery Siano, Philadelphia, and at Landesgalerie/Landesmuseum in Linz, Austria. He will show at 1708 Gallery in Richmond, VA, in May 2006. Recent talks include panels at the New Museum of Contemporary Art and -empyre-. Images of his art, including his four-year weblog project using HTML to make images, and more writings are at http://chrisashley.net. He lives in Oakland, CA.

For more information on Joe McKay, visit:
http://homepage.mac.com/joester5/art/index.html



 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 04:57 PM

4. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Katy Grannan: Large color photographs of apparently lonely or alienated subjects found through the artist's well-known newspaper ad recruitment process posed in various states of undress in dingy rooms with cheap wood paneling or outdoors, several near or in water. The work deals with the implications of power and voyerurism regarding the artist and the viewer, and the implications of collaboration, exhibitionism, and self--empowerment regarding the subject in ways just barely beyond banal. Thanks goodness for wonderful new printing technology, but ultimately would've made a great LIFE magazine spread in 1969. (Fraenkel, Jan. 5 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Katy Grannan: Large color photographs of apparently lonely or alienated subjects found through the artist's well-known newspaper ad recruitment process posed in various states of undress in dingy rooms with cheap wood paneling or outdoors, several near or in water. The work deals with the implications of power and voyeurism regarding the artist and the viewer, and the implications of collaboration, exhibitionism, and self-empowerment regarding the subject. (Fraenkel, Jan. 5 - Feb. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Rob Craigie: This show is called Wonder; it predominately comprises paintings of butterflies on paper made in a manner well-known to pre-school children everywhere: fold a piece of paper down the middle, open it and paint a half of a butterfly on one side, then fold again and press the two sides together, and unfold for a finished butterfly. Ah, beautiful butterflies, and what variety! I did not watch the 58-minute video in the back room; would you? (Haines Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Rob Craigie: This show is called Wonder; it predominately comprises paintings of butterflies on paper made in a manner well-known to pre-school children everywhere: fold a piece of paper down the middle, open it and paint a half of a butterfly on one side, then fold again and press the two sides together, and unfold for a finished butterfly. The gallery walls are covered with scores of beautiful butterflies, which seem to be evidence of Craigie's investigation into the marks and variety found in of various insects of the order Lepidoptera,. The 58-minute video demands viewer endurance. (Haines Feb. 16 - Mar. 25)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 04:53 PM

Jacob Lawrence/Thomas Nozkowski

 

 


Jacob Lawrence: Harriet Tubman Series, 1939-40, Panel #9
Gift of the Harmon Foundation, Hampton University Museum, Hampton, Virginia

Thomas Nozkowski: Untitled (8-45), 2003, 22 x 28 inches, oil on linen on panel

Thomas Nozkowski: Untitled (8-67), 2005, oil on linen on panel, 22 x 28 inches

Jacob Lawrence: Card Game, 1953 The Walter O. Evans Collection of African American Art, © Gwendolyn Knight Lawrence. Courtesy of the Jacob and Gwendolyn Lawrence Foundation

I can't be the only one seeing the connections here. And I think these connections go deeper than the surface-- image, pattern, rhythm, intricacy, directness; I think there is something more social and political at work, though more overt in Jacob Lawrence, and more abstract but definitely present in Thomas Nozkowski. Maybe I can find time later to say more about this.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 12:13 AM

February 21, 2006

21. Raney Nickel

 

 

               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               

Raney Nickel (*), 2006, HTML, 340 x 220 pixels

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 05:05 PM

3. In the San Francisco Galleries (after Donald Judd)

 

 

Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Josh Dov: Very competent, sensitive, dense, beautiful grids built up with dry horizontal and vertical brushstrokes and muted colors on unprimed canvas, though a solution other than simply running strokes to and off the edge would make them look less like stretched Tartan fabric. No one in Northern California knows who Helmut Federle is except for the few who do and who probably think they are alone, so these paintings' derivation are quite safe until one looks at a Helmut Federle. Gotcha. The few works on paper are like a cleaned-up late-seventies Brice Marden, so unfortunately the cats out of the bag there. Bummer, and double bummer on the very unfriendly gallerist (minus one point); still nice work. (Brian Gross, Feb. 2 March 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Josh Dov: Very competent, sensitive, dense, beautiful grids built up with dry horizontal and vertical brushstrokes and muted colors on unprimed canvas, though a solution other than simply running strokes to and off the edge would make them look less like stretched Tartan fabric. One might think of recent Helmut Federle acrylic on raw canvas paintings, and the works on paper might remind one of Brice Marden. Dov is on his way towards finding his own voice. (Brian Gross, Feb. 2 March 18)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Variegated Radiant Dream Plot: Chris Duncan and Jovi Schnell are from the Bay Area (one penalty point), and David Dupuis is from New York (one bonus points). Besides, Dupuis' drawings have surprising graphic variety and complexity. Duncan's string installation is insipid; maybe that is his intention, otherwise it would make a great Deadhead Maypole. Some of Jovi Schnell's colorful drawings combine a German folk esthetic with the structure of an elaborate Mexican ceramic or Mayan Flint scepter and a Huichol palette. Possible penalty point: sometimes this gallerist appears a touch grouchy. (Gregory Lind- Jan 25 Feb 25)

Visited February 18, 2006
Chris Ashley (after Donald Judd)
"In the San Francisco Galleries"
Look, See, February 2006
Variegated Radiant Dream Plot: Chris Duncan and Jovi Schnell are from the Bay Area and David Dupuis is from New York. Dupuis' drawings have surprising graphic variety and complexity. Duncan's string installation is uninspired; it would make a great Deadhead Maypole. Some of Jovi Schnell's colorful drawings combine a German folk esthetic with the structure of an elaborate Mexican ceramic or Mayan Flint scepter and a Huichol palette. (Gregory Lind- Jan 25 Feb 25)

Visited February 18, 2006

Read a post from 20060228 for explanation and context.

 

 

 

 

Posted by chrisashley at 01:33 PM

February 20, 2006

20. Sheffield